Readings:
2216782
ZAGQ24ME,ELCYUH7S,Q9L5G8KZ
items
1
chicago-author-date
0
default
asc
https://edblogs.columbia.edu/20183musi3341w001/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22instance%22%3A%22zotpress-2ddb1d2611b02e0b5181ce40c242e03f%22%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22ELCYUH7S%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2216782%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Sturm%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222014-04-03%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3ESturm%2C%20Bob%20L.%202014.%20%26%23x201C%3BThe%20State%20of%20the%20Art%20Ten%20Years%20After%20a%20State%20of%20the%20Art%3A%20Future%20Research%20in%20Music%20Information%20Retrieval.%26%23x201D%3B%20%3Ci%3EJournal%20of%20New%20Music%20Research%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2043%20%282%29%3A%20147%26%23x2013%3B72.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F09298215.2014.894533%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F09298215.2014.894533%3C%5C%2Fa%3E.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22The%20State%20of%20the%20Art%20Ten%20Years%20After%20a%20State%20of%20the%20Art%3A%20Future%20Research%20in%20Music%20Information%20Retrieval%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Bob%20L.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Sturm%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222014-04-03%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1080%5C%2F09298215.2014.894533%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%220929-8215%2C%201744-5027%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.tandfonline.com%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2Fabs%5C%2F10.1080%5C%2F09298215.2014.894533%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222019-10-28T17%3A58%3A52Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22ZAGQ24ME%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2216782%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Drott%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222018-08%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EDrott%2C%20Eric%20A.%202018.%20%26%23x201C%3BMusic%20as%20a%20Technology%20of%20Surveillance.%26%23x201D%3B%20%3Ci%3EJournal%20of%20the%20Society%20for%20American%20Music%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2012%20%283%29%3A%20233%26%23x2013%3B67.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1017%5C%2FS1752196318000196%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1017%5C%2FS1752196318000196%3C%5C%2Fa%3E.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Music%20as%20a%20Technology%20of%20Surveillance%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Eric%20A.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Drott%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22This%20article%20explores%20surveillance%20in%20cloud-based%20music%20streaming.%20Key%20catalysts%20in%20the%20transition%20from%20ownership-%20to%20access-based%20models%20of%20music%20distribution%2C%20services%20like%20Spotify%2C%20Pandora%2C%20or%20Deezer%20have%20positioned%20themselves%20as%20a%20means%20of%20reintegrating%20listeners%20into%20%5Cu201cdigital%20enclosures%5Cu201d%20over%20which%20rights%20holders%20exercise%20greater%20control.%20Yet%20streaming%27s%20promise%20of%20remonetizing%20musical%20commodities%20demonetized%20by%20filesharing%20has%20been%20called%20into%20doubt%20by%20difficulties%20in%20converting%20users%20of%20advertising-based%20%5Cu201cfreemium%5Cu201d%20services%20into%20paying%20subscribers.%20In%20need%20of%20alternative%20means%20of%20extracting%20value%20from%20users%2C%20streaming%20platforms%20have%20increasingly%20refashioned%20themselves%20as%20enterprises%20whose%20business%20extends%20beyond%20music-related%20services%20to%20encompass%20the%20collection%2C%20aggregation%2C%20and%20exchange%20of%20user%20data.%20In%20pursuing%20this%20strategy%2C%20streaming%20platforms%20place%20themselves%20in%20direct%20competition%20with%20other%20new%20media%20companies%20trading%20in%20user%20data.%20In%20order%20to%20distinguish%20themselves%20from%20such%20competitors%2C%20streaming%20platforms%20cast%20music%20as%20a%20particularly%20valuable%20source%20of%20data%2C%20offering%20privileged%20access%20to%20listeners%5Cu2019%20innermost%20selves.%20But%20they%20also%20cast%20music%20as%20an%20ideal%20tracking%20device%2C%20accompanying%20individuals%20across%20a%20variety%20of%20social%2C%20physical%20and%20geographical%20spaces.%20In%20this%20way%2C%20the%20very%20attributes%20that%20make%20music%20so%20powerful%20a%20%5Cu201ctechnology%20of%20the%20self%5Cu201d%20facilitate%20its%20transformation%20into%20an%20equally%20powerful%20technology%20of%20surveillance.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222018%5C%2F08%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1017%5C%2FS1752196318000196%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%221752-1963%2C%201752-1971%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww-cambridge-org.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu%5C%2Fcore%5C%2Fjournals%5C%2Fjournal-of-the-society-for-american-music%5C%2Farticle%5C%2Fmusic-as-a-technology-of-surveillance%5C%2F93CD1408A9FF2DBD3DDC93A9148752F7%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222018-09-04T20%3A55%3A53Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22Q9L5G8KZ%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2216782%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Askin%20and%20Mauskapf%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222017-10-01%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A1%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EAskin%2C%20Noah%2C%20and%20Michael%20Mauskapf.%202017.%20%26%23x201C%3BWhat%20Makes%20Popular%20Culture%20Popular%3F%20Product%20Features%20and%20Optimal%20Differentiation%20in%20Music.%26%23x201D%3B%20%3Ci%3EAmerican%20Sociological%20Review%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2082%20%285%29%3A%20910%26%23x2013%3B44.%20%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1177%5C%2F0003122417728662%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1177%5C%2F0003122417728662%3C%5C%2Fa%3E.%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22What%20Makes%20Popular%20Culture%20Popular%3F%20Product%20Features%20and%20Optimal%20Differentiation%20in%20Music%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Noah%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Askin%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Michael%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Mauskapf%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22In%20this%20article%2C%20we%20propose%20a%20new%20explanation%20for%20why%20certain%20cultural%20products%20outperform%20their%20peers%20to%20achieve%20widespread%20success.%20We%20argue%20that%20products%5Cu2019%20position%20in%20feature%20space%20significantly%20predicts%20their%20popular%20success.%20Using%20tools%20from%20computer%20science%2C%20we%20construct%20a%20novel%20dataset%20allowing%20us%20to%20examine%20whether%20the%20musical%20features%20of%20nearly%2027%2C000%20songs%20from%20Billboard%5Cu2019s%20Hot%20100%20charts%20predict%20their%20levels%20of%20success%20in%20this%20cultural%20market.%20We%20find%20that%2C%20in%20addition%20to%20artist%20familiarity%2C%20genre%20affiliation%2C%20and%20institutional%20support%2C%20a%20song%5Cu2019s%20perceived%20proximity%20to%20its%20peers%20influences%20its%20position%20on%20the%20charts.%20Contrary%20to%20the%20claim%20that%20all%20popular%20music%20sounds%20the%20same%2C%20we%20find%20that%20songs%20sounding%20too%20much%20like%20previous%20and%20contemporaneous%20productions%5Cu2014those%20that%20are%20highly%20typical%5Cu2014are%20less%20likely%20to%20succeed.%20Songs%20exhibiting%20some%20degree%20of%20optimal%20differentiation%20are%20more%20likely%20to%20rise%20to%20the%20top%20of%20the%20charts.%20These%20findings%20offer%20a%20new%20perspective%20on%20success%20in%20cultural%20markets%20by%20specifying%20how%20content%20organizes%20product%20competition%20and%20audience%20consumption%20behavior.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%22October%201%2C%202017%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1177%5C%2F0003122417728662%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%220003-1224%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1177%5C%2F0003122417728662%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222018-08-21T10%3A15%3A34Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Sturm, Bob L. 2014. “The State of the Art Ten Years After a State of the Art: Future Research in Music Information Retrieval.” Journal of New Music Research 43 (2): 147–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2014.894533.
Drott, Eric A. 2018. “Music as a Technology of Surveillance.” Journal of the Society for American Music 12 (3): 233–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196318000196.
Askin, Noah, and Michael Mauskapf. 2017. “What Makes Popular Culture Popular? Product Features and Optimal Differentiation in Music.” American Sociological Review 82 (5): 910–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417728662.
Response:
No written response required, but be prepared to discuss the Drott as the main target piece for the seminar.